SIGN IN YOUR ACCOUNT TO HAVE ACCESS TO DIFFERENT FEATURES

FORGOT YOUR PASSWORD?

FORGOT YOUR DETAILS?

AAH, WAIT, I REMEMBER NOW!
  • LOGIN

RSQ1 - PhysiCare International

  • Home
  • RSQ1
    • Testimonials
    • What is RSQ1?
      • RSQ1 Contraindications
    • Where can I be treated? – RSQ1 Clinics
  • News
    • News
    • Calendar
  • Shop
  • Contact

Another systematic review which supports the use NMES for quadriceps strength after ACL reconstruction

by sam / Tuesday, 06 February 2018 / Published in News
Systematic Review

Following our reference to the systematic review of Hauger et al. in December 2017, we want to inform you with the outcome of another systematic review, which has been published already in 2010. Although, this review is a couple of years older, it’s still very interesting, because it has a closer look in the possible causes for the shown differences in results between the different Randomized Clinical Trials (RCT).

Just as the the systematic review of Hauger et al., the systematic review of Kim et al. (2010) supports the use of NeuroMuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) in combination with regular physical therapy to improve quadriceps strength. In general, the results of both reviews are almost the same, however there are some small differences in details: Where Kim et al. show an significant in improve in the first 4 weeks, this period in prolonged to 4-12 weeks in the review of Hauger et al. In the review of Kim et al. the improvement in function wasn’t significant, while this was the case in the most recent review of Hauger. These small detailed differences are probably caused by the addition of some more recent published RCT’s.

Nevertheless it’s interesting to read the review of Kim et al., because it gives a closer look at the differences of the applied forms of NMES in the different RCT’s. From this, it appears that the studies with self-treatment of the patient, a battery-operated portable stimulator and even the studies with highest amount of durations and sessions show the lowest results on quadriceps strength.

Although this evidence wasn’t enough for a statistical difference, it’s again an indication which endorses our experiences, which favors the achieved results and used guidelines (short, high intensity sessions, powered by a specially developed battery and operated by certified paramedics) of the RSQ1 over those of it’s competitors.

 

The article of Kim et al (2010) is open-access and you can find it here .

  • Tweet

About sam

What you can read next

Recently published systematic review supports the addition of NMES to standard physical therapy
RSQ1 at World Lacrosse Championship!
Patellar Tendinopathy
Case Report: Tendinopathy of the patellar tendon

Another systematic review which supports the use NMES for quadriceps strength after ACL reconstruction

by sam / Tuesday, 06 February 2018 / Published in News
Systematic Review

Following our reference to the systematic review of Hauger et al. in December 2017, we want to inform you with the outcome of another systematic review, which has been published already in 2010. Although, this review is a couple of years older, it’s still very interesting, because it has a closer look in the possible causes for the shown differences in results between the different Randomized Clinical Trials (RCT).

Just as the the systematic review of Hauger et al., the systematic review of Kim et al. (2010) supports the use of NeuroMuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) in combination with regular physical therapy to improve quadriceps strength. In general, the results of both reviews are almost the same, however there are some small differences in details: Where Kim et al. show an significant in improve in the first 4 weeks, this period in prolonged to 4-12 weeks in the review of Hauger et al. In the review of Kim et al. the improvement in function wasn’t significant, while this was the case in the most recent review of Hauger. These small detailed differences are probably caused by the addition of some more recent published RCT’s.

Nevertheless it’s interesting to read the review of Kim et al., because it gives a closer look at the differences of the applied forms of NMES in the different RCT’s. From this, it appears that the studies with self-treatment of the patient, a battery-operated portable stimulator and even the studies with highest amount of durations and sessions show the lowest results on quadriceps strength.

Although this evidence wasn’t enough for a statistical difference, it’s again an indication which endorses our experiences, which favors the achieved results and used guidelines (short, high intensity sessions, powered by a specially developed battery and operated by certified paramedics) of the RSQ1 over those of it’s competitors.

 

The article of Kim et al (2010) is open-access and you can find it here .

  • Tweet

About sam

What you can read next

Recently published systematic review supports the addition of NMES to standard physical therapy
RSQ1 now also available in Poland
News Update: RSQ1 – winter ’14-’15

Another systematic review which supports the use NMES for quadriceps strength after ACL reconstruction

by sam / Tuesday, 06 February 2018 / Published in News
Systematic Review

Following our reference to the systematic review of Hauger et al. in December 2017, we want to inform you with the outcome of another systematic review, which has been published already in 2010. Although, this review is a couple of years older, it’s still very interesting, because it has a closer look in the possible causes for the shown differences in results between the different Randomized Clinical Trials (RCT).

Just as the the systematic review of Hauger et al., the systematic review of Kim et al. (2010) supports the use of NeuroMuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) in combination with regular physical therapy to improve quadriceps strength. In general, the results of both reviews are almost the same, however there are some small differences in details: Where Kim et al. show an significant in improve in the first 4 weeks, this period in prolonged to 4-12 weeks in the review of Hauger et al. In the review of Kim et al. the improvement in function wasn’t significant, while this was the case in the most recent review of Hauger. These small detailed differences are probably caused by the addition of some more recent published RCT’s.

Nevertheless it’s interesting to read the review of Kim et al., because it gives a closer look at the differences of the applied forms of NMES in the different RCT’s. From this, it appears that the studies with self-treatment of the patient, a battery-operated portable stimulator and even the studies with highest amount of durations and sessions show the lowest results on quadriceps strength.

Although this evidence wasn’t enough for a statistical difference, it’s again an indication which endorses our experiences, which favors the achieved results and used guidelines (short, high intensity sessions, powered by a specially developed battery and operated by certified paramedics) of the RSQ1 over those of it’s competitors.

 

The article of Kim et al (2010) is open-access and you can find it here .

  • Tweet

About sam

What you can read next

RSQ1 at World Lacrosse Championship!
Pilotstudy: The effect of the RSQ1 during rehabilitation after ACL reconstruction
Renewed CE IIa Certificate

Another systematic review which supports the use NMES for quadriceps strength after ACL reconstruction

by sam / Tuesday, 06 February 2018 / Published in News
Systematic Review

Following our reference to the systematic review of Hauger et al. in December 2017, we want to inform you with the outcome of another systematic review, which has been published already in 2010. Although, this review is a couple of years older, it’s still very interesting, because it has a closer look in the possible causes for the shown differences in results between the different Randomized Clinical Trials (RCT).

Just as the the systematic review of Hauger et al., the systematic review of Kim et al. (2010) supports the use of NeuroMuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) in combination with regular physical therapy to improve quadriceps strength. In general, the results of both reviews are almost the same, however there are some small differences in details: Where Kim et al. show an significant in improve in the first 4 weeks, this period in prolonged to 4-12 weeks in the review of Hauger et al. In the review of Kim et al. the improvement in function wasn’t significant, while this was the case in the most recent review of Hauger. These small detailed differences are probably caused by the addition of some more recent published RCT’s.

Nevertheless it’s interesting to read the review of Kim et al., because it gives a closer look at the differences of the applied forms of NMES in the different RCT’s. From this, it appears that the studies with self-treatment of the patient, a battery-operated portable stimulator and even the studies with highest amount of durations and sessions show the lowest results on quadriceps strength.

Although this evidence wasn’t enough for a statistical difference, it’s again an indication which endorses our experiences, which favors the achieved results and used guidelines (short, high intensity sessions, powered by a specially developed battery and operated by certified paramedics) of the RSQ1 over those of it’s competitors.

 

The article of Kim et al (2010) is open-access and you can find it here .

  • Tweet

About sam

What you can read next

Accreditation of Dutch ‘Keurmerk Fysiotherapie’
RSQ1 in scientific article
RSQ1 now also available in Poland

Another systematic review which supports the use NMES for quadriceps strength after ACL reconstruction

by sam / Tuesday, 06 February 2018 / Published in News
Systematic Review

Following our reference to the systematic review of Hauger et al. in December 2017, we want to inform you with the outcome of another systematic review, which has been published already in 2010. Although, this review is a couple of years older, it’s still very interesting, because it has a closer look in the possible causes for the shown differences in results between the different Randomized Clinical Trials (RCT).

Just as the the systematic review of Hauger et al., the systematic review of Kim et al. (2010) supports the use of NeuroMuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) in combination with regular physical therapy to improve quadriceps strength. In general, the results of both reviews are almost the same, however there are some small differences in details: Where Kim et al. show an significant in improve in the first 4 weeks, this period in prolonged to 4-12 weeks in the review of Hauger et al. In the review of Kim et al. the improvement in function wasn’t significant, while this was the case in the most recent review of Hauger. These small detailed differences are probably caused by the addition of some more recent published RCT’s.

Nevertheless it’s interesting to read the review of Kim et al., because it gives a closer look at the differences of the applied forms of NMES in the different RCT’s. From this, it appears that the studies with self-treatment of the patient, a battery-operated portable stimulator and even the studies with highest amount of durations and sessions show the lowest results on quadriceps strength.

Although this evidence wasn’t enough for a statistical difference, it’s again an indication which endorses our experiences, which favors the achieved results and used guidelines (short, high intensity sessions, powered by a specially developed battery and operated by certified paramedics) of the RSQ1 over those of it’s competitors.

 

The article of Kim et al (2010) is open-access and you can find it here .

  • Tweet

About sam

What you can read next

Zarko Milovanovic – physiotherapist of Ujpest FC 1885
Addition of RSQ1 increases mobility on FFD test
RSQ1 now also available in Poland

Another systematic review which supports the use NMES for quadriceps strength after ACL reconstruction

by sam / Tuesday, 06 February 2018 / Published in News
Systematic Review

Following our reference to the systematic review of Hauger et al. in December 2017, we want to inform you with the outcome of another systematic review, which has been published already in 2010. Although, this review is a couple of years older, it’s still very interesting, because it has a closer look in the possible causes for the shown differences in results between the different Randomized Clinical Trials (RCT).

Just as the the systematic review of Hauger et al., the systematic review of Kim et al. (2010) supports the use of NeuroMuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) in combination with regular physical therapy to improve quadriceps strength. In general, the results of both reviews are almost the same, however there are some small differences in details: Where Kim et al. show an significant in improve in the first 4 weeks, this period in prolonged to 4-12 weeks in the review of Hauger et al. In the review of Kim et al. the improvement in function wasn’t significant, while this was the case in the most recent review of Hauger. These small detailed differences are probably caused by the addition of some more recent published RCT’s.

Nevertheless it’s interesting to read the review of Kim et al., because it gives a closer look at the differences of the applied forms of NMES in the different RCT’s. From this, it appears that the studies with self-treatment of the patient, a battery-operated portable stimulator and even the studies with highest amount of durations and sessions show the lowest results on quadriceps strength.

Although this evidence wasn’t enough for a statistical difference, it’s again an indication which endorses our experiences, which favors the achieved results and used guidelines (short, high intensity sessions, powered by a specially developed battery and operated by certified paramedics) of the RSQ1 over those of it’s competitors.

 

The article of Kim et al (2010) is open-access and you can find it here .

  • Tweet

About sam

What you can read next

Pilot Study: RSQ1 increases strength after ACL Reconstruction
RSQ1 at World Lacrosse Championship!
News Update: RSQ1 – winter ’14-’15

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Electrotherapy to increase recovery after a knee surgery

    As announced over the summer, our research depa...
  • Electrotherapy to increase recovery after a knee surgery

    As announced over the summer, our research depa...
<
< 2023 >
March
>
Month
Month
List
Week
Day
MTuWThFSS
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Recent Comments

  • instance on Medical Staff FC Utrecht
  • ratu poker88 on Medical Staff FC Utrecht
over a year agoSearching for a #RSQ1 treatment? Many new #RSQ1 clinics have appeared in recent times: https://t.co/JhR8rxj9Tb
over a year agoRT @Rsq1Italia: @rsq1italia #cristianaulivi Fisioterapia RSQ1, più rapida, più efficace, più rafforzante! A Roma, il responsabile italiano…
Follow @@RSQ1takingcare
PhysiCare International bv - RSQ1

2 days ago

PhysiCare International bv - RSQ1
With dr Alessandro Pagani we have again a new certified #RSQ1 therapist in Italy:Anche il Dr Alessandro Pagani ha deciso di acquistare RSQ1 per assistere i suoi atleti e pazienti.RSQ1, l’innovazione al servizio di tutti 👏🏻👏🏻💪🏻 #rsq1italia #fisioterapia #calcio #dottssaulivi #rsq1fisioterapiaebenessere #fastrecovery #training #seriea #recuperofunzionale #allenamento #prevenzione @rsq1italia @rsq1.takingcare ... See MoreSee Less

Photo

View on Facebook
· Share

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linked In Share by Email

rsq1.takingcare

With dr Alessandro Pagani the amount of #RSQ1 loca With dr Alessandro Pagani the amount of #RSQ1 locations in #Italy is still increasing. #repost
Visit @arfisioterapiaempoli for a treatment with t Visit @arfisioterapiaempoli for a treatment with the #RSQ1 from their experienced therapists. #repost
See how @fisioterapiacalimeri can help you with th See how @fisioterapiacalimeri can help you with the #RSQ1 to recover from knee injuries. #repost
Squatting with the #RSQ1 at @sportkinetic_ in #Rom Squatting with the #RSQ1 at @sportkinetic_ in #Rome:
Load More... Follow on Instagram

Physicare International combines years of experiences and expertise in the electrostimulation in the development of the RSQ1 device and is the exclusive distributor of this device.Besides the world wide distribution of the RSQ1 device, Physicare International wants to distinguish itself as a center of knowledge for the electrotherapy. We stay in good contact with all the (para)medics, clinics and organizations that work with the RSQ1 device and keep an eye on all the different experiences with the RSQ1 device. Therefore we organize seminars for expierenced RSQ1 therapists where they can share their knowledge and expierences. Furthermore, Physicare International initiate scientific studies by different partners with electrotherapy as subject of the study. These subjects can be a result of the above mentioned seminars, or questions from the field, or are based on new innovative initiatives. Our Quality Management System is conform the Medical Device Directives 93/42/EEC Annex V. The RSQ1 is produced by an ISO 13485 certified company.

TOP